Did you know? Your future teachers are already hired

Are you facing another year of vacancies in your building? ED.gov reports there are still 95,000 fewer public education employees supporting our students next year compared to pre-pandemic levels.

The U.S. has faced recurring teacher shortages for decades, a situation exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2024, all 50 states reported teacher shortages in at least one subject area. These shortages vary significantly across states and districts, influenced by differences in pay and working conditions. However, a consistent trend is that schools serving larger numbers of low-income students and students of color—as well as subjects such as special education, mathematics and science—face the most severe shortages.

At the same time the Bureau of Labor Statistics is reporting that after-school workers grew by an average of 9% and that this workforce is on track to continue to grow over the next five years. Some explanations for this growth might include ESSER summer learning requirements and a low unemployment rate. Lower unemployment rates create the need for more childcare services for working families.

As school leaders, we grow talent, which then grows student learning gains. And that talent growth leads to upward mobility in our communities. One of our best under-tapped resources are staff who work in out-of-school time (OST). According to the Afterschool Alliance, these are professional staff that often reside in the neighbors surrounding our schools. They may also have their own children enrolled in the school, making program quality a personal priority.

Whether you are a principal, HR leader or superintendent, what steps can you take to begin ‘growing your own’ from the OST pipeline?

  1. Arrange for time with the OST Director. Ask them about program quality and whether or not the OST program has engaged in a program quality assessment (PQA). Talk with them about their staff. The OST director recruits, hires and trains diverse staff members who already work closely with students and families. Ask them, who are the natural program leaders? What are their future plans?
  2. Set up time to do an OST walk together. Notice the quality of the program. Is there a link between the instructional day and after school beyond “homework time”? Are there enrichment activities that the students are responding to? Who is leading those activities? Those are the people you want to talk with.
  3. Talk to OST staff that you and the director agree might be interested in expanding their professional practice into the school day as a teacher or other professional. Make arrangements for that person to spend time in a school day setting by pairing them up with a teacher leader on campus.
  4. If they’re interested, develop a short-term support plan to connect that person with your school system’s transition to teaching program. Make time to check in with them and the OST director on their progress.
  5. If possible, consider monetary incentives to boost their pay. Retaining OST staff poses its own challenges. Most staff report lower pay as a primary reason for leaving the job. Investing in a professional growth plan that includes compensation is a win/win for these staff who work with students for more hours per day than in-school time staff.

OST connections to the school day are powerful. These connections offer not only extensions of learning and enrichment, they offer a potential pipeline of high-quality future teachers. We recommend these five steps to encourage collaboration with OST directors, evaluate program quality and engage all OST staff.

It may even lead to your next new teacher, one with community understanding and prior experience in working directly with your students, ultimately enhancing student learning and community well-being.

Faculty learning communities: Why they’re still a great idea

Faculty learning communities provide faculty with the chance to work in a trans-disciplinary fashion on matters of importance to a cohort or a particular topic for the cohort to work on.
ByDana Godek & Van Williams

Faculty learning communities (FLC) as an approach to improving pedagogy have their roots in 1979 when the first FLC was launched at Miami University by Dr. Milton D. Cox. FLCs have since expanded to include making teaching and learning visible efforts, like those at the University Colorado, Boulder, to professional learning communities, communities of practice, to its natural outgrowth as professional organizational development programs.

FLCs provide faculty with the chance to work in a trans-disciplinary fashion on matters of importance to a cohort or a particular topic for the cohort to work on. Whether part of teaching and learning centers, centers of teaching excellence or faculty cohort pedagogy fellowships, the number of FLC-related activities on campuses in the US and globally is a testament to the benefit of the instruction, faculty and, ultimately, students.

While there is a distinction between terms like faculty learning communities, professional learning communities and communities of practice, for purposes of this article, there are enough fundamental similarities between the three to consider them all to fall under the umbrella of “learning communities”: they all understand that learning and instruction are socially situated, and both contribute to improved teaching and learning.

Encouraging participation in faculty learning communities

The institution, of course, is essential in creating and sustaining an FLC effort. Many institutions choose to locate their established FLC activities in the provost’s office and offer faculty participation through application. In contrast, others prefer to house the FLC efforts in centers for teaching excellence—suggesting a high level of commitment in the university hierarchy.

The support for FLCs can be demonstrated through the means available to the institution, such as class release, stipend for participation and showcasing and rewarding faculty projects. These efforts could help to encourage hesitant faculty to engage FLCs. Instead of potentially “telling faculty that what they have been doing for the past five, 10,or even 30 years may not be the most effective approach—especially for today’s students” (Brownwell & Tanner, 2017), participation in an FLC can be framed as an opportunity for focused work on pedagogy and recognition of that work.

Creating participation: New faculty

The traditional model for FLCs concentrates efforts on teaching or a particular organizational topic; more recent models focus on widening the scope of the FLC to concentrate on new faculty hires to orient new faculty to the changes in teaching and professional expectations. As such, FLCs become a tool for retention.

New faculty hires can benefit from FLCs that are designed for new hires. Beyond the typical institutional orientation, new faculty FLCs can be designed for eight areas of importance in higher education (Beane-Katner, 2011, p.93) and help to enculturation the new faculty:

  • Solid grounding in their fields, as well as the ability to address interdisciplinary questions;
  • Knowledge about the learning process and a wide range of teaching strategies;
  • Ability to incorporate technology in their pedagogy;
  • Understanding of the concepts of engagement and service in their institution and how scholarship can link to service;
  • The capability to communicate effectively with various audiences on and off campus;
  • Experience working with diverse groups;
  • Appreciation of institutional citizenship, and
  • Understanding and appreciation of the core purposes and values of higher education.

This eight-step orientation process involves cognitive changes and emotional and social dimensions, thereby fostering a comprehensive transformation. The process underscores the role of experiential activities and contextual awareness in facilitating this learning process, promoting a deeper understanding of personal and situational influences on beliefs and actions. Future research should focus on the subjective aspects of transformative learning, such as the impact of relationships and emotions on critical reflection and learning outcomes.

These areas of importance are well-suited to a learning community approach as faculty development. They could allow institutions to move beyond the traditional new faculty orientation model (93).

Indeed, the enculturation of new faculty shouldn’t be limited to tenure-line hires, especially in the current climate of disappearing tenure lines and increasing contingent faculty. An FLC approach that mixes more senior faculty with contingent faculty would help both groups: senior faculty can better understand opportunities for teaching or topic-based cohort activities by including the perspectives and approaches of contingent faculty to develop mutually beneficial projects on teaching research. Especially since contingent faculty are often juggling multiple courses at multiple institutions, an FLC could help to foster belonging (Ahlers, et.al)

The future of FLCs will continue to expand beyond encouraging faculty pedagogy and scholarship. Positioning faculty to engage opportunities for interdisciplinary scholarship and support through FLCs will help move both engagement and application.

Large Urban Culture Looks Good in Data and in Life, Fort Worth, TX

Fort Worth Independent School District (FWISD) is solving the need for culture and climate strategy on high-needs campuses. The new model is so successful it was featured at the International Social & Emotional Learning Exchange, 2023 and its Executive Sponsor, Dr. Cherie Washington, received a 2023 District Administrator Leadership Institute Annual Distinction Award. Working with EduSolve, the team used a collaborative developmental methodology and created a common delivery framework that establishes the foundation for equitable outcomes to meet the individual needs of each and every child.

The project began by organizing cross functional teams that represented academics, behavior/climate, schools, equity and inclusion, and technology solutions to catalyze their shared vision for MTSS and promotion of emotional health. As a team, we piloted a new practice guide with priority schools showing a high level of culture challenges. These schools are identified using a composite score of attendance, discipline, and academic performance outcomes. FWISD has reduced the number of these schools from 17 to 13 in the first six months of implementation.

Small District, Big Results

Whitehall City Schools, Whitehall, OH

We built the framework for strategic planning tapping into authentic community engagement.

Stakeholders are clear, they want the school district: “Ensuring a Secure Finish, Achieving Resilience”. This is the community-wide proactive initiative and focal point for the conclusion of the school year, and strategic plan formation underway now. EduSolve redefines

parent engagement in public schools through our campaigns on active involvement, collaboration, and participation of parents or guardians in their child’s educational experience. It goes beyond traditional parent-teacher interactions and involves parents taking an active role in supporting their child’s learning, attending school events, and contributing to the overall school environment.